Fashion & Apparel · US
A written explanation for this grade has not been published yet. The criteria below show what the score rests on.
Every pillar, criterion by criterion — with the rubric level behind each score.
Serious labor concerns or repeated unresolved criticism from credible sources.
General responsible-sourcing claims without useful specifics.
Same category, higher grade — Fashion & Apparel brands that rate better than Nike.
You represent Nike? Corrections and new evidence are re-scored by the same methodology — write to privacy@ethica.cc
Basic commitments or generic code-of-conduct statements only.
Weak or unclear external verification; mostly self-reported claims.
Mixed record; some concerns exist, but severity or directness is unclear.
Some public environmental reporting exists, but coverage is limited or patchy.
Some clear targets exist, but they are narrow or weakly evidenced.
Some third-party evidence exists, but it is limited, narrow, or difficult to assess.
Mixed record; some concerns exist, but they are limited, indirect, or unclear.
Some clear policy commitments exist, but they are limited in scope or detail.
Some third-party evidence exists, but it is limited or narrow.
Some useful public reporting exists, but it is partial or inconsistent.
Mixed record; some concerns exist, but severity or directness is unclear.
Some governance or ethics policies exist, but they are limited in scope or detail.
Some visible response exists, but follow-through or detail is limited.
The grade says what the evidence shows; this says how much evidence stands behind it — five weighted dimensions.