Cosmetics & Beauty · FR · loreal.com
A written explanation for this grade has not been published yet. The criteria below show what the score rests on.
Every pillar, criterion by criterion — with the rubric level behind each score.
Mixed record; some concerns exist, but severity, recency, or directness is unclear.
Some public labor or supply-chain reporting, but limited detail.
Some clear labor commitments exist, but they are narrow or weakly evidenced.
You represent L’Oréal? Corrections and new evidence are re-scored by the same methodology — write to privacy@ethica.cc
Some third-party indication exists, but it is limited or narrow.
No major recent environmental issue found, but evidence coverage is limited.
Strong environmental disclosure with useful detail on impacts, emissions, or sustainability actions.
Strong public commitments across several environmental topics with measurable direction.
Strong external signals from recognized certifications, datasets, or credible third-party reviews.
Mixed record; some concerns exist, but they are limited, indirect, or unclear.
Some clear policy commitments exist, but they are limited in scope or detail.
Some third-party evidence exists, but it is limited or narrow.
Some useful public reporting exists, but it is partial or inconsistent.
Mixed record; some concerns exist, but severity or directness is unclear.
Some governance or ethics policies exist, but they are limited in scope or detail.
Some visible response exists, but follow-through or detail is limited.
The grade says what the evidence shows; this says how much evidence stands behind it — five weighted dimensions.